The world's three largest record companies were seeking substantially more money from ByteDance in 2019 for music used on TikTok and its China-based counterpart, Douyin. Universal Music Group, Sony Music Entertainment and Warner Music Group were negotiating as existing agreements approached expiration. Reports said the companies could remove their catalogs if talks failed, a prospect that would strike at the basic creative language of both short-video apps.
Why a few seconds of music mattered
TikTok users did not generally open the app to listen to a full album. They selected a short song segment, recorded a dance, joke or transformation around it, and invited other users to make their own versions. A clip could therefore appear in thousands of videos and reach an enormous audience. ByteDance argued that this was a different form of consumption from a conventional on-demand music service. Labels answered that music was not incidental: familiar recordings made challenges searchable, repeatable and commercially valuable.
According to Music Business Worldwide's account of the talks, the labels wanted guarantees worth hundreds of millions of dollars. The demand reflected ByteDance's rapid growth and a reported private valuation near $75 billion. The company had acquired Musical.ly in 2017 and merged it into TikTok in August 2018, combining an established lip-syncing community with its recommendation technology. By early 2019, TikTok had passed one billion estimated downloads worldwide.
Licensing is about more than access
A music agreement normally addresses which recordings may be used, in which countries, for how long and under what reporting system. It can include an advance or minimum guarantee as well as usage-based payments. The record label controls the sound recording, while publishers and songwriters control the underlying composition, so a platform may need several layers of permission for the same track. Accurate identification is especially difficult when users speed up, remix or combine songs with other audio.
The negotiations also raised a question for artists: does viral exposure compensate for modest direct payment? TikTok could push an old track back into public attention or help an unknown performer reach listeners on streaming services. Yet a promotional effect is uncertain and does not remove the need to license copyrighted work. Labels wanted the financial value of that discovery engine to be shared with rights holders rather than retained mainly by the platform.
High stakes for both sides
Pulling the major-label catalogs would have left large gaps in TikTok's sound library and disrupted existing trends. For the labels, however, staying without stronger terms risked establishing a low benchmark as short-form video became a permanent part of music marketing. Both sides therefore had reasons to negotiate instead of allowing a prolonged blackout.
ByteDance was also considering ways to move users from discovery toward paid listening, according to reports about a possible music-streaming product. Such a service would intensify comparisons with Spotify and Apple Music and make formal relationships with rights owners even more important. TikTok's ability to create demand could become a path to full-song streams, subscriptions or ticket and merchandise sales, but only if attribution and licensing kept pace.
The dispute showed that TikTok was no longer a small experimental app. Music helped fuel its extraordinary expansion, and the companies that owned much of that music expected contracts to reflect the new scale. Whatever numbers the parties eventually accepted would influence how labels, platforms and creators divided the value of the next generation of viral hits.
Recent Comments